There’s always this one moment as a reader that feels strangely powerful: you finish a book, you close the cover (or swipe that last digital page), and your finger hovers over the Goodreads star rating. It looks so simple. Just pick a star, done. But let’s be honest: it’s never that simple.

Because sometimes I’ll give a book four stars, not because it wasn’t amazing, but because I’m saving that elusive fifth star for something “greater.” And then, weeks later, I’ll look back and think: Why did I stop at four? That book stayed with me for days, kept circling my thoughts, and clearly deserved more.

This is the paradox of book ratings: what seems like a neat five-point system is actually a messy tangle of mood, timing, comparisons, and overthinking.

The Myth of the Objective Rating

On paper, the star system is clear. Five means breathtaking brilliance. One means pure disaster. Everything else falls somewhere in the middle.

But in reality, ratings are emotional, inconsistent, and stubbornly personal. A four-star book on a good day might have been five on another. A three-star book might only be “average” in comparison to what I read just before. And sometimes, the number has more to do with me than with the book itself.

Mood: The Invisible Rating Partner

Here’s the truth: my mood is the invisible co-pilot every time I rate a book.

If I binge a novel in one sitting, I sometimes get frustrated with pacing or tropes that wouldn’t have bothered me had I stretched it over a week. A slow-burn scene can feel beautiful if I let it simmer; rushed, if I force it down in one gulp.

But the opposite is also true. Some books are just long. And I mean very long — think 25–30 hours of audiobook time or 700+ pages. When you spend days, sometimes weeks, in the same story, fatigue sets in. It’s not that the book is bad, but like any marathon, even the most scenic track can make you weary. And that weariness seeps into the star rating.

I’ve caught myself docking half a star simply because I listened to a long fantasy audiobook in giant chunks on commutes, and by the 20th hour, I was impatient. The book may have deserved five, but my listening habits pushed it down to four.

(Here I like to pull in Goodreads examples — my 5-star reads that blew me away, my four-star books that could’ve been fives on a different day, the solid fours that truly fit their rating, and those three-star “shrug zone” reads. If you’re curious, let’s connect on Goodreads and compare notes!)

The Goodreads Example Shelf

Let me show you how this plays out on my actual shelves:

5-Star Reads ✨
Books that gave me the cosmic wow effect. They lingered, they haunted, they had me pressing them into friends’ hands.
(Insert your own examples: Nevernight, The Folk of the Air, Birth of a Dynasty …)
4 Stars, But Could Have Been 5 🌟
Those books where I hesitated. Maybe I was holding back, maybe my mood was off. Looking back, some of these probably deserve five.
(Examples: Red Queen, Sword Catcher …)
Solid 4-Star Reads 🌌
Enjoyable, memorable, but without that mind-blowing factor. Perfectly solid, perfectly four.
(Examples: Thief of Night, Empire of the Vampire …)
3-Star Reads — The Shrug Zone 🤷‍♀️
Sometimes three means “good but not great.” Other times, it’s more of a comparison penalty: enjoyable in isolation, but overshadowed by stronger reads around it.
(Examples: Shield of Sparrows, The Courting of Bristol Keats…)

This is exactly why ratings feel inconsistent — they’re tied to context, not just content.

The Philosophy of the Fifth Star

Five stars are rare. For me, a book doesn’t have to be perfect to earn them — it just has to move me deeply, in a way that feels unforgettable. Sometimes I don’t even realize a book was a five until weeks later, when I’m still thinking about it or recommending it nonstop.

And then I wonder: should I go back and change the rating? Goodreads lets me. But do I rewrite my past, or leave it as a snapshot of who I was at that moment? That’s the eternal dilemma.

Should We Standardize the Chaos?

Sometimes I fantasize about being more scientific. Imagine:

Story/plot: 1–10
Character development: 1–10
Consistency/logic: 1–10
Atmosphere/worldbuilding: 1–10

Add them up, divide them down, convert them neatly into stars. Voilà: a fair, logical system.

And honestly, I already kind of do this. In my head, there are half-stars everywhere. 3.5, 3.75, sometimes even a “soft” 4. Goodreads may not allow it, but my internal system sure does.

But then I catch myself thinking: am I overcomplicating this? Do I really need a math problem every time I close a book? Probably not. And yet, the temptation is there — because part of me wants the system to feel fair, while another part knows reading is anything but objective.

Rating as a Reflection of Ourselves

In the end, maybe ratings aren’t about books at all. Maybe they’re about us — our moods, our expectations, our life phases. A romance subplot that thrilled me at twenty might bore me now. A grimdark epic that once excited me might now feel emotionally heavy.

Our stars reflect our state of mind as much as the story itself. They’re little time capsules, showing not just what we read, but who we were when we read it.

Final Thoughts (and Your Turn)

So here’s where I land: book ratings are messy. They’re subjective. They’re moody. And that’s okay.

Sometimes I’ll change a rating after a month. Sometimes I’ll leave it. Sometimes I’ll give 3.75 stars in my head even though Goodreads will only let me pick 3 or 4. And maybe that’s part of the fun — ratings as imperfect snapshots of the imperfect, emotional way we experience stories.

Now I’d love to hear from you:
👉 Do you stick to a system?
👉 Do you ever change your ratings later?
👉 Do you secretly use half-stars like me?

Drop a comment, let’s compare shelves on Goodreads, and embrace the cosmic chaos together. 🌌

📌 Follow us on Instagram & TikTok (@cosmi.creads.club) for more bookish content, reviews, and recommendations!

✨ Keep chasing stars & stories,

– Viktoria, Your Cosmic Book Guide

5 Stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ or Not? – The Cosmic Struggles of Rating Books